This section establishes an emergency situation of the Solidarity Fund.
in the protocol is written that the Solidarity Fund has allowed in these 10 years to address the tensions and workers in the banking system, but the Fund's measures to manage the redundancy have become burdensome and " are no longer fully appropriate to the needs of employers and workers " .
It therefore establishes the creation of a Department-emergency Fund applicable to redundant workers who are not eligible to access the Fund.
For these workers, after completion of contract procedures and preventive law (Law 223/1991 on collective redundancies ) and reached a corporate agreement, the Department would either provide for an emergency situation up to 24 months receive a grant of income support equal to amounts ranging from 60 to 80% of salary .
At first we wonder about why the measures provided by the Fund Solidarity no longer appropriate to the needs of workers. It 'true that the recent operation of government has extended the age requirements for retirement, creating uncertainty for workers who already have gone to the solidarity fund and for those about to go there (see also the recent statement of our Parent Company on "uniqueness in the future use of the Solidarity Fund" - 14/07/10's Office informed the group). But the agreement in question last December and therefore the Abi ever since, regardless of the maneuver, calling into question the solidarity fund, but just when they are becoming more stringent workers to manage the tensions which the Fund category was created.
Secondly, we note the lack of the necessary information regarding the progress that has led to the signing of the Agreement of 16/12/2009.
on this agreement, even in the face of the obvious importance of the issues, there are adequate communication, nor a mandate by workers, and the first to sign the agreement. If the renewal of a National Collective Bargaining Agreement is made on a platform discussed and voted on by the workers, a fortiori such an agreement should provide for these steps.
is not a substitute for participation, discussion and terms of reference workers and members on the choices that directly affect our future with a factual situation.
Substance see that section in the agreement establishing the emergency situation is not the slightest trace of content that engage businesses and workers to resolve the crisis through concrete measures of solidarity at the level of banking system , in some cases the only ones that can make possible the preservation of jobs. The result is that through this agreement in business realities becomes weaker and isolated the real scenario in Section-emergency placement of those workers that do not qualify for personal access to the Solidarity Fund.
And 'what is happening in Delta Banking Group (small group through the bank which has operated in Italy, Cassa di Risparmio di San Marino, who incidentally is also the subject of investigation by the judiciary - on which see the press of the national secretariat of 15.06.2010), where several hundred workers at risk of losing their jobs and be located in the emergency situation in their application of the Protocol of 16.12.2009.
Moreover, the signing of agreements on cases of collective redundancies in the banking sector accompanied by a kind of mobility allowance for two years clashes sharply with the simultaneous self-attribution of substantial economic gains for the year 2010 for the top management of large groups.
What we have to acknowledge: that the crisis does not undermine the profit margins that are distributed to fatten the pockets of the apical structure of the companies, while refusing to consider the ABI real solidarity measures to protect the work and to actually into question the tools already contracted?
In this way, even as the government extends the deadline for the board and the companies claim to be "unusable in the future," the Solidarity Fund, Abi the meantime it opens the way generally collective redundancies based on the evaluation of convenience of the companies freed from any obligation of protection of fundamental workers' needs, we repeat it-where-is not in the protocol nor any of 16/12/2009 recall efforts to protect the work.
E 'must not fail to mention this picture and it is unfortunate duty to express our support for the employees of companies in difficulties, thereby enhancing the commitment to defend the interests of all employment.
on these issues we believe our duty to draw attention to and promote the necessary steps for information and discussion on these agreements, which are open and addressed to members and all workers for an adequate awareness and participation.
Rome August 2, 2010
RSA FISAC-CGIL UniCredit Corporate Banking SpA ROME
0 comments:
Post a Comment